{"id":1057,"date":"2010-09-05T13:28:05","date_gmt":"2010-09-05T11:28:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ofcourseimright.com\/?p=1057"},"modified":"2010-09-05T13:28:05","modified_gmt":"2010-09-05T11:28:05","slug":"on-states-suing-over-a-national-healthcare-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/?p=1057","title":{"rendered":"On States Suing over a National Healthcare Plan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ofcourseimright.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/06\/court.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-17\" title=\"court\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ofcourseimright.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/06\/court.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"141\" height=\"140\" \/><\/a>I had a guest here this weekend who told me of one theory of why states might sue the federal government over portions of the Obama Healthcare Plan that requires individuals to buy insurance.\u00a0 The theory goes that the federal government is not authorized by any clause in the Constitution to <strong>force<\/strong> individuals to pay for healthcare.\u00a0 A plain and superficial reading of the Constitution would seem to support that. This leads to three questions:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Is ObamaCare constitutional?<\/li>\n<li>If not, can it be made constitutional?<\/li>\n<li>Who is doing the suing and why?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>First, a caveat: <strong>I am not a lawyer.\u00a0 All lawyers: please chime in.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>Is ObamaCare Constitutional?<\/h2>\n<p>Next, some Constitutional basics.\u00a0 The way our form of government works, each and every law that Congress passes must find some authorizing basis from within the Constitution, because the 10th Amendment of the Constitution clearly states:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor  prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively,  or to the people.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In other words, Congress has to find a basis for the law from within the Constitution.\u00a0 For the better part of three centuries, however, Congress has largely been able to get around this restriction through what has become  known as the Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, \u00a78 Cl. 3):<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>[The Congress shall have  power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several  States, and with the Indian tribes;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u201cCommerce among the several states\u201d has been interpreted to mean, for instance, the ability of someone in New York to charge for access to its waterways.\u00a0 That was what <em>Gibbons v. Ogden<\/em> (22 US 1) in 1824.\u00a0 It&#8217;s largely the basis of how drug laws are authorized today by the federal government.\u00a0 Some people might say that this is a stretch of the clause, and that in fact <strong>requiring <\/strong>expenditures from individuals on health insurance would be even more of a stretch.<\/p>\n<p>So what&#8217;s the logic in favor of the law?\u00a0 That has its basis in the theory of insurance.\u00a0 Here I will say that I am not an insurance expert, by the way.\u00a0 This much I know: a risk pool requires that everyone not make a claim at the same time, and the lower the likely percentage of claims over some period of time, the need for less money by the insurance companies to satisfy claims.<\/p>\n<p>In the context of health care, if only old and sick people buy insurance, because they make up for the bulk of claims, the money required to pay out claims would require very high premiums, thus reducing any benefit to having insurance.\u00a0 On the other hand, if only healthy people bought into the system, since there would be very few claims, there would be no need for high premiums.\u00a0 Indeed, healthy people might not buy insurance at all, or very limited policies.\u00a0 In short, insurers can only sell health insurance to sick and old people if they have a group of otherwise healthy and young to reduce costs.<\/p>\n<p>Does the decision of someone to not buy insurance in one state impact consumers in and companies in other states?\u00a0 If there exist risk pools that cross state boundaries, then the answer would appear to be yes.\u00a0 Otherwise it would seem the answer is no.<\/p>\n<h2>If ObamaCare is not constitutional, can it be made so?<\/h2>\n<p>Supposing the Supreme Court found mandatory premiums unconstitutional, what could the Congress and administration do to get around it?\u00a0 The tax system offers us one possibility.\u00a0 The 16th Amendment authorized Congress to tax us:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from  whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States,  and without regard to any census or enumeration.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>One way the Congress could get around this would be to impose a tax that is the amount of a minimum premium, and then allow for a credit based on the costs expended on that premium.\u00a0 Loophole?\u00a0 Perhaps.\u00a0 But not the first.<\/p>\n<p>Coming back to the Commerce Clause, the Congress probably could not have imposed a national speed limit without relying on highway funding.\u00a0 They probably could not themselves have prosecuted individuals for traveling over 55 or 65 mph.\u00a0 Instead they required the states to pass laws or face losing highway funding.<\/p>\n<h2>Who is doing the suing and why?<\/h2>\n<p>Ultimately if we look at the states that have filed suit, I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see a distinctly Republican red tinge to them.\u00a0 For one thing, the strategy of Republicans has been to obstruct any Democrat initiative, no matter the harm that obstruction causes to individuals.\u00a0 Here, what possible benefit could individuals who are uninsured gain from not having health insurance?\u00a0 Today 45 million Americans don&#8217;t have a choice because they cannot take part in a well balanced risk pool, and hence cannot afford <strong>any<\/strong> coverage.\u00a0 Tomorrow even if they don&#8217;t have a choice on insurance, at least they&#8217;ll have some coverage.<\/p>\n<h2>Summary<\/h2>\n<p>In short, while considering the constitutional elements is interesting at an academic level, the officials doing the suing are harming the very people they are supposed to be serving.\u00a0 Perhaps voters should remember that.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I had a guest here this weekend who told me of one theory of why states might sue the federal government over portions of the Obama Healthcare Plan that requires individuals to buy insurance.\u00a0 The theory goes that the federal government is not authorized by any clause in the Constitution to force individuals to pay &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/?p=1057\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;On States Suing over a National Healthcare Plan&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":172,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50,17,30,4],"tags":[359,238,130,154],"class_list":["post-1057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-complexity","category-economics","category-humanity","category-politics","tag-constitution","tag-healthcare","tag-obama","tag-republicans"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/172"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1057"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1057\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1059,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1057\/revisions\/1059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}