{"id":2178,"date":"2017-03-06T10:21:39","date_gmt":"2017-03-06T08:21:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ofcourseimright.com\/?p=2178"},"modified":"2017-03-06T14:26:07","modified_gmt":"2017-03-06T12:26:07","slug":"finding-real-news-as-opposed-to-fake-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/?p=2178","title":{"rendered":"Finding REAL News as Opposed to Fake News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The great New York Senator <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Daniel_Patrick_Moynihan\">Daniel Patrick Moynihan<\/a> famously said that everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.\u00a0 Unfortunately, our democracy is being undermined by a combination of an epidemic of fake news and people being willing to believe the drivel.<\/p>\n<p>What, then, are trustworthy news outlets?\u00a0 To start with, they have to have <strong>paid <\/strong>reporters.\u00a0 Determining the truth requires investigation with feet on the ground.\u00a0 It requires document searches, interviews, and research.\u00a0 That costs money.<\/p>\n<p>Still, a well funded propaganda outfit could pay (or claim to pay) for \u201creporters\u201d.\u00a0 How to tell the difference?\u00a0 Be suspicious of any site is primarily focused on national politics or <strong>any<\/strong> single issue.<\/p>\n<p>Here are a three tests to guide someone as to whether a news outlet is likely legitimate for daily consumption.\u00a0 The tests themselves aren\u2019t perfect, but they\u2019re pretty good.<\/p>\n<h3>1. Does the outlet have many news bureaus?<\/h3>\n<p>A real newspaper will have at least one regional bureau for the region they are covering, and will often have an additional bureau for a state capital or for Washington.\u00a0 Fake news sources may not have any bureaus.\u00a0 A simple test is to type the name of the site and then &#8220;news bureaus&#8221; into a search engine and examine the results.\u00a0 Note that a regional paper will tend to have only a few bureaus outside their region.\u00a0 That&#8217;s okay, so long as they stick to news where they have those bureaus and more importantly reporters.<\/p>\n<h3>2. Does the outlet have multiple unrelated sections?<\/h3>\n<p>Real news sources will have sections such as weather, sports, obituaries, arts, finance, and region, as opposed to just politics.\u00a0 They may not have <strong>all<\/strong> of these sections: for instance, the Wall Street Journal doesn\u2019t have a weather section, but their finance section is unparalleled.<\/p>\n<h3>3. Does the outlet ever publish corrections?<\/h3>\n<p>Even if the answer to the first two questions is \u201cyes\u201d, no one is perfect.\u00a0 But a good news outlet will recognize their imperfections and always seek to report the truth, no matter how embarrassing it may be.\u00a0 A good measure of an outlet\u2019s trustworthiness is how regularly they correct themselves.<\/p>\n<h3>Let&#8217;s Test<\/h3>\n<p>Given these parameters let\u2019s see whether a web site is a good source for news.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Source<\/th>\n<th>Multiple Bureaus?<\/th>\n<th>Unrelated Sections?<\/th>\n<th>Corrections?<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/nytimes.com\">The New York Times<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Multiple, throughout New York, US, and the world<\/td>\n<td>NY region, sports, weather, obits, arts<\/td>\n<td>Regularly at the bottom of an article online, or in a section in paper.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/foxnews.com\">Fox News<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Multiple affiliates<\/td>\n<td>Sports, weather, numerous regions<\/td>\n<td>Not too often.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/breitbart.com\">Breitbart<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Four bureaus<\/td>\n<td>no<\/td>\n<td>Very rarely<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wikipedia.org\">Wikipedia<\/a><\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<td>Yes (vast)<\/td>\n<td>Entries are continually edited<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/dailycaller.com\">The Daily Caller<\/a><\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<td>Never<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\">NPR<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Many regional affiliates along with international bureaus<\/td>\n<td>Numerous<\/td>\n<td>Regularly online and on radio<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\">The Wall Street Journal<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Strong presence in financial capitals<\/td>\n<td>Finance, Travel, even some Sport<\/td>\n<td>Regularly at the bottom of articles<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\">Politico<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Primarily national, with a few state and international bureaus<\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<td>Very Rarely<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Trust, of course, is not a binary.\u00a0 That\u2019s why it\u2019s important to get information from multiple sources, maybe not every day, but regularly.\u00a0 Also, just because something is not marked as a trustworthy news outlet doesn\u2019t mean their lying.\u00a0 It does however, mean, that they&#8217;re something <strong>other<\/strong> than a trustworthy <strong>news<\/strong> outlet.\u00a0 A blog, perhaps, or an analysis site.\u00a0 Wikipedia is an interesting case because nobody gets paid, but the information tends to be reasonably trustworthy (or at least transparent).<\/p>\n<p>All of this doesn&#8217;t get people off the hook from using their common sense.\u00a0 RT would easily pass the above tests, and yet they are a well known and well funded propaganda arm of Vladimir Putin.\u00a0 Probably not a good news source.\u00a0 Most blogs aren&#8217;t so well funded.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here are three simple tests to determine whether a site is a trustworthy news outlet.  Are there multiple sections? Does it have multiple news bureaus? Does the site post corrections?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":172,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50,30,4],"tags":[503,558,559],"class_list":["post-2178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-complexity","category-humanity","category-politics","tag-news","tag-real-news","tag-trust"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/172"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2178"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2178\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2185,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2178\/revisions\/2185"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ofcourseimright.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}